True, true, true.

Posted in Law | Leave a comment

The real climate agenda — poverty and suffering.

The global warming/climate change ideologues preached green energy, but not because the neo-Marxist left knew we had to achieve NZE [net zero emissions] to save the planet. Today’s radical green revolutionaries embrace NZE because they know that capitalism will fail, not because the world’s workers will unite, but because advanced industrial economies will collapse without abundant, cheap hydrocarbon fuels.

The Push for ‘Net Zero Emissions’ is Climate Hoax Fiction, Not Energy Reality.”  By Jerome Corsi, American Thinker, 5/3/23

Posted in Climate | Leave a comment

Troops out of Syria.

Thank you, Congresswoman Hageman for voting yea on H. Con. Res. 21 on March 8.  Had the the resolution passed it would have directed the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove U.S. forces from Syria.  Unfortunately it failed 103-321.  There were 47 Republican and 56 Democrat yeas. Speaker McCarthy voted nea.

Here’s a little background:

The question is, does the US executive’s claim that its actions in Syria comport with US law stand up to scrutiny? Not only does it not, the claim is risible.

“Under both Mr. Obama and Mr. Trump,” explains the New York Times’ Charlie Savage, “the executive branch has argued that the war against Islamic State is covered by a 2001 law authorizing the use of military force against the perpetrators of the Sept. 11 attacks [Gowans’s emphasis] and a 2002 law authorizing the invasion of Iraq.”

However, while “ISIS grew out an offshoot of Al Qaeda, the two groups by 2014 had split and became warring rivals,” and ISIS did not perpetrate the 9/11 attacks. What’s more, before the rise of ISIS, the Obama administration had deemed the Iraq war over.

The Largely Unrecognized US Occupation of Syria. Nearly One Third of Its Territory.”  By Stephen Gowans, What’s Left, 3/11/18. Mr. Gowans is quite the ardent Marxist but he has got this point about Syria exactly right.


Posted in Syria | Leave a comment

Interesting take on Trump.

The Tragedy of Imran Khan in Pakistan is one of those side issues that’s actually more important than the main issue, Ukraine. The unprecedented intervention by the Pakistani military, always aligned with western forces, is a clear sign that Mackinderism is alive and well in central Asia.

There is a clear civil war incipient in Pakistan as the civilian government attempts to wrest real control of the country away from the military and its globalist order-givers. Khan’s support isn’t a product of his brilliance as a leader. Like Donald Trump, he is a flawed figure, beset on all sides by traitors undermining him.

He was ousted through the worst kind of backroom dealing, of the type and kind which Italian deep staters were looking at and saying, “Damn! Bravo.”

But, also like Trump, the people understand implicitly that he’s one of them. He’s on their side, despite his faults. So, while we see the most amateurish headlines and ‘analysis’ of what’s happening there from our quisling media, the Pakistani people are coming out by the millions to elevate Khan as their champion.

Luongo: No Truce With The Heartland.” By Tom Luongo, 5/27/23.

Posted in Populism, Trump | Leave a comment

Challenging corporate power.

The populist right’s thirst for a true challenge to corporate power demands more than tired, decades-old GOP talking points.<1>

“Money power” is more accurate but Mr. Bartee is 99% right.

The tepid desire of RINO opponents of the Freedom Caucus in the Wyoming legislature to inject a “more moderate,” “less divisive,” “more centrists,” “more moderate,” and a “more inclusive” way of doing things leaves me cold. 

For if the trumpet give an uncertain sound, who shall prepare himself to the battle? 1 Corinthians 14:8

So, onward to something. Or not. Who knows?

If there’s a more accurate take on what the rock-hard, non-negotiable principles of “traditional Republicans” are please straighten me out.  As of now, I don’t get “traditional Republicanism” and I think Wyoming and the nation itself now exist in something that more closely resembles a casino where every calculation of probability favors the house. A functioning constitutional republic responsive to the states and the sovereign people it isn’t.  But don’t you just love those voting machines?

Continue reading
Posted in Populism | Leave a comment